Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 748 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9920X - 146 vs 131 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $375.23 vs $587.46
- Up to 43% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9920X - $2.57 vs $4.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 105 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $587.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$375.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $375.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |