Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 2516 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i3-9100 - $64.03 vs $145.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i3-9100 - $0.7 vs $1.21 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 32% better in Far Cry 6 than FX-8150 - 120 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |