Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 199 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 11% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G4900 - 177 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - $68.02 vs $590.0
- Up to 87% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-9900X - $0.43 vs $3.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 54 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900X doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $590 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
160
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |