Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2244 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Escape From Tarkov than FX-4130 - 213 vs 187 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $22.92 vs $410.0
- Up to 94% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i9-9900K - $0.12 vs $1.92 per FPS
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $410 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |