Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4170 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4170 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1632 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4170.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4170 - 136 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $41.6 vs $405.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9900K - $0.33 vs $2.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $405 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Buy for $41.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Core i3-4170 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |