Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-14700F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1907 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 25% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-9900K - 738 vs 591 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $369.57 vs $410.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-9900K - $0.5 vs $0.69 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900K - 28 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $410 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
738
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$369.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $369.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 20 |
16 | Threads | 28 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |