Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4170 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4170 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3170 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4170.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $41.6 vs $435.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-13900F - $0.34 vs $2.75 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 31% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-4170 - 158 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170 - 32 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $41.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4170 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |