Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1958 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-3250 - 181 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $56.34 vs $405.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-9900K - $0.37 vs $2.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $405 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2159 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
153
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |