Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3496 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $48.0 vs $316.71
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 76% better in Starfield than Core i3-3250 - 79 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 24 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75911 minutes ago
Buy for $316.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75911 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
19.992484028560693%
Multi-Core
1130
7.3021001615508885%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |