Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2585 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $48.0 vs $325.0
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 66% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-3250 - 409 vs 246 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 24 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75932 minutes ago
Buy for $325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75933 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
30.76923076923077%
Multi-Core
1130
11.266201395812562%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |