Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10850K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 20 days older than the cheaper Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-10850K - 189 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10850K - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Up to 30% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $279.0 vs $399.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $1.54 vs $2.11 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9143 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
181
95%
Value, $/FPS
$1.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$279
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |