Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 58% better in War Thunder than Core i3-6300 - 270 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $68.02 vs $419.95
- Up to 74% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-13900F - $0.4 vs $1.56 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
270
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.56/FPS
25.641025641025646%
Price, $
$419.95
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $419.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
171
63.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1262
46.227106227106226%
Multi-Core
2539
14.745339450606886%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |