Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 1128 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $68.03 vs $225.1
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 24 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $68.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Buy for $225.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1262
99.05808477237049%
Multi-Core
2539
34.062248457204184%
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |