Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $91.64 vs $275.98
- Up to 51% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i9-10900 - $0.64 vs $1.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 47% better in League of Legends than Core i3-6300 - 210 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 20 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
143
68%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$91.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $91.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10673 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
48%
Price, $
$275.98
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10673 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |