Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $92.61 vs $235.99
- Up to 58% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Core i7-10700K - $0.94 vs $2.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 5% better in Sons Of The Forest than Core i3-6300 - 105 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
100
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$92.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $92.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
105
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.25/FPS
41%
Price, $
$235.99
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $235.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |