Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3964 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 36% better in Far Cry 5 than FX-6200 - 247 vs 182 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $42.85 vs $480.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i9-13900 - $0.24 vs $1.94 per FPS
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $480 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 3 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |