Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1526 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 26% better in Minecraft than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 843 vs 671 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $109.99 vs $353.8
- Up to 62% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-12900KF - $0.16 vs $0.42 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
843
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
38%
Price, $
$353.8
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $353.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
671
79%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |