Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 233 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-10105F - 150 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $85.13 vs $272.99
- Up to 65% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-12900KF - $0.64 vs $1.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
35%
Price, $
$272.99
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $272.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5928 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5927 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |