Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 381 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 3% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 170 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 36 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - $197.65 vs $1200.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-10980XE - $1.2 vs $7.06 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.06/FPS
16%
Price, $
$1200
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
165
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10980XE | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 12 |
36 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |