Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 41% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-8320 - 83 vs 59 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $95.0 vs $469.99
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 239 minutes ago
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 239 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |