Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 6 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Starfield than Ryzen 3 3100 - 64 vs 59 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $94.99 vs $440.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-10900K - $1.61 vs $6.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $440 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15174 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
59
92%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |