Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3574 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-760 - 168 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $100.0 vs $430.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-10900K - $0.69 vs $2.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $430 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |