Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1283 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 15% better in Dead Island 2 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 165 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing Dead Island 2 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $2.62 vs $2.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $399.99 vs $432.77
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 44 vs 20 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$432.77
92%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $432.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 885 minutes ago
Buy for $399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 881 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 22 |
20 | Threads | 44 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 145 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |