Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $275.98 vs $1399.99
- Up to 77% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-13700F - $2.46 vs $10.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900 - 130 vs 112 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
86%
Value, $/FPS
$2.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2088 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.77/FPS
22%
Price, $
$1399.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2087 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |