Buy on Amazon
$1,595.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $4938
Availability
MSRP in USD: $4938
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1351 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 44 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 6% better in Borderlands 3 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 233 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $325.0 vs $1595.95
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 105 vs 145 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699A v4 22 Core 2.40GHZ 55MB 145W CM8066003197800 (OEM Tray Processor)
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77227 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-core, 24-Threads Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
67.95835743204164%
Multi-Core
9619
95.90229312063808%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 12 |
44 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 145 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
