Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 1126 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Up to 18% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $399.99 vs $485.95
- Up to 10% better value when playing Minecraft than Ryzen 9 3950X - $0.6 vs $0.67 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 9% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 725 vs 665 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 105 vs 145 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
665
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$399.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 244 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
725
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
89%
Price, $
$485.95
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for $485.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 16 |
44 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |