Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2270 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $399.99 vs $485.0
- Consumes up to 3% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 145 vs 150 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 44 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 38% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 917 vs 665 FPS
- Up to 12% better value when playing Minecraft than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.53 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 243 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
917
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$485
82%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $485 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 244 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 24 |
44 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |