Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700 is 2262 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700 - 44 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 13% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 240 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $319.99 vs $399.99
- Up to 29% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $1.33 vs $1.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 242 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
240
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$319.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $319.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 243 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 16 |
44 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |