Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1897 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $399.99 vs $411.33
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900F - 44 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 842 vs 665 FPS
- Up to 18% better value when playing Minecraft than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.49 vs $0.6 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 244 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
842
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$411.33
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $411.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 244 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 16 |
44 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
145 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |