Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4300 is 1436 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 0% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-920 - 234 vs 233 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-920 - $48.02 vs $94.0
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Bloomfield | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |