Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 2772 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-920 - 103 vs 89 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-920 - $45.93 vs $90.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 12 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 243 minutes ago
Buy for $45.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 246 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
415
35.16949152542373%
Multi-Core
1434
26.167883211678834%
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |