Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 2389 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i3-7100 - 45 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Core i7-840QM - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-840QM doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
201
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10853 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-840QM | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |