Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450 outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3450 is 679 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 45 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-840QM - 322 vs 317 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-840QM doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-840QM
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Core i5-3450
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-840QM | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
