Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4130T outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4130T is 1169 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-840QM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-840QM - 116 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-840QM - 35 vs 45 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-840QM doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-840QM
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Core i3-4130T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-840QM | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
