Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2566 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 45 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-840QM - 119 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-840QM - 64 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-840QM
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-840QM | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | EPYC |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
