Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3922 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 21% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-840QM - 108 vs 89 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
108
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3764 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-840QM | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |