Key Differences
In short — Core i7-840QM outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-840QM is 2844 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 45 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-840QM doesn't have integrated graphics
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$68.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10654 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-840QM | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Clarksfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 54 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |