Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i7-720QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3297 days newer than Core i7-720QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-720QM
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 33% better in Starfield than Core i7-720QM - 56 vs 42 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-720QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$188.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-720QM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Clarksfield | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
12.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |