Buy on Amazon
$180
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 824 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6350 - 136 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 91 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $100.0 vs $180.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-6700K - $0.79 vs $1.32 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-6700K
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4140 minutes ago
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-6700K
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
