Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-640M vs FX-6350

Core i7-640M vs FX-6350: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — FX-6350 outperforms Core i7-640M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 946 days newer than Core i7-640M.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-640M

  • Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of AMD FX-6350

  • Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-640M - 91 vs 89 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640M - 6 vs 4 threads
This is a free version of Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020.
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i7-640M Logo
Core i7-640M

Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010


FPS

89

97%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

AMD FX-6350 Logo
FX-6350

Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013


FPS

91

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.1/FPS

100%

Price, $

$100

100%

FPS and Value Winner

AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition

Buy for $100 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 1868 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i7-640M Logo
Core i7-640M

Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010

AMD FX-6350 Logo
FX-6350

Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-640M Logo
Core i7-640M

Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010


Single-Core

419

85%

Multi-Core

790

50%

AMD FX-6350 Logo
FX-6350

Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013


Single-Core

488

100%

Multi-Core

1556

100%

Intel Core i7-640M Logo

Intel Core i7-640M

vs
AMD FX-6350 Logo

AMD FX-6350

Sep 26th, 2010Release Date
Apr 29th, 2013
Core i7CollectionFX
ArrandaleCodenameVishera
Intel Socket G1SocketAMD Socket AM3+
Mobile
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
6
4Threads
6
2.8 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.9 GHz
3.5 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.2 GHz
35 W
TDP125 W
32 nmProcess Size32 nm
21.0x
Multiplier19.5x
HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.