Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Core i7-640M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 946 days newer than Core i7-640M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-640M - 91 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640M - 6 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
91
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1868 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640M | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Arrandale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |