Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4850HQ outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4850HQ is 147 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4850HQ
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1610 - 124 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 47 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-4850HQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4850HQ | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Crystal Well | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
47 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
