Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i7-4810MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2906 days newer than Core i7-4810MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4810MQ
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-4810MQ - 135 vs 125 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4810MQ | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
47 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |