Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Core i7-4810MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1079 days newer than Core i7-4810MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4810MQ
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i3-7100 - 47 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-4810MQ - 343 vs 337 FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
343
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4810MQ | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
47 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |