Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms Core i7-4810MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1079 days newer than Core i7-4810MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4810MQ
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-4810MQ - 133 vs 132 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i7-4810MQ - 35 vs 47 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15632 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4810MQ | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
47 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |