Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i7-3667U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1605 days newer than Core i7-3667U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3667U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 17 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 10% better in Minecraft than Core i7-3667U - 665 vs 602 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3667U - 44 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
665
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$399.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3667U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 22 |
4 | Threads | 44 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 145 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |