Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Core i7-3667U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 2888 days newer than Core i7-3667U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3667U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700 - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 30% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-3667U - 580 vs 445 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3667U - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3667U
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3667U | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
![[Windows 11] Dell Inspiron 3891 Desktop PC Image](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/pc-builds/B01DVTMAL8.jpg)
