Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 1036 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 8% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than EPYC 7551P - 254 vs 235 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700 - 64 vs 16 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | EPYC |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 32 |
| 16 | Threads | 64 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
![[Windows 11] Dell Inspiron 3891 Desktop PC Image](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/pc-builds/B01DVTMAL8.jpg)
