Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 179 vs 174 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
![[Windows 11] Dell Inspiron 3891 Desktop PC Image](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/pc-builds/B01DVTMAL8.jpg)
