Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms Core i7-3667U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 1916 days newer than Core i7-3667U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3667U
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 17 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 3% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-3667U - 257 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3667U - 28 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
257
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$397.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $397.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2881 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3667U | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |