Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3820 outperforms Core i7-3667U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3820 is 111 days older than Core i7-3667U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3667U
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 17 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Performs up to 3% better in Lost Ark than Core i7-3667U - 229 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3667U - 8 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
229
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$319.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3667U | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |